|
|
Latest
News
The Environment is Destroying the Motor Car
There's no ignoring the need to reduce emissions
- in fact we all accept the need to do everything that's practically
possible to reduce the damage we do to our environment. But government
measures to impose so-called "green" taxes seem to have
more in common with window dressing than they do with any meaningful
ecological strategy. This view, expressed by The New Cars Network,
is echoed widely across the motor industry.
A more joined-up thought process could create positive benefit for
the environment without further de-stabilising the motor industry
and fuelling inflation. The measures play to the gallery without
producing the results they're supposed to return. Taxing through
VED (Vehicle Excise Duty) on bigger cars may appeal if you feel
envious because the guy over the road's dogs go walkies in the back
of a new BMW Touring. But does it make sense to load extra overhead
on the washing machine service man with 3 children next door because
he bought a People Carrier? And where's the benefit for the environment
in either case? The tradesman could do 30,000 miles a year but the
BMW might do only 10,000.
Dealers of new cars,
used cars and car
leasing agents are already seeing a change in buying patterns
as buyers turn to smaller, more economical
cars. At first sight that looks like good news for the environment,
but building a Fiat Punto doesn't soak up that much less resource
than building a Ford Galaxy. Yet
the Galaxy can carry seven people, nearly twice the capacity of
the Fiat."
A recent Autocar article highlighted the imbalanced concentration
that places the motor industry in the ecological firing line. Matt
Saunders observed that little pressure is being applied to homeowners
to buy more efficient central heating boilers. The article fuels
speculation that government's focus on the evil automobile is driven
by political rather than environmental motives. Imposing higher
taxes on 4x4s looks attractive when we consider the queue of Shoguns
and Freelanders outside the local primary school. But does a 4WD
Fiat Panda really eat more ozone than a BMW 330?
If current taxation proposals go through, it could cost £1,000
a year to tax a 3.0 litre Mondeo ST. The Ford can return 30mpg,
and it's equipped with catalysts and enough engine management wizardry
to make the exhaust gases smell of summer meadows. Of course, you
could sell the Mondeo and buy a 1964 Jensen CV8. The Jensen does
12mpg and belches out more pollution than Amoco Cadiz colliding
with an aerosol dump, but those nice people in Whitehall won't charge
you a penny in road tax.
The UK motor industry employs some 600,000 people. Its importance
is reflected in the changes that have been made to year marking
in registration numbers, all attempting to even out the seasonal
buying peaks that distort the market when registration letters change.
Yet 30,000 jobs have been lost in manufacturing since 2005. Fuel
duty and other punitive taxation measures are already distorting
car values. Under the proposed retrospective taxation changes, the
damage to the automotive industry itself will be huge. Effectively
killing the value of larger used cars registered since March 2001
means that dealers' stock values will plummet. We'll see individuals
and dealers unable to keep their cars, but equally unable to sell
them. Result? Perfectly good vehicles being scrapped because there
will be no demand, wasting yet more energy to recycle them and of
course build the "eco friendly" replacement.
Given the millions invested by motor manufacturers in cleaning up
their cars' emissions, this is a disappointing and frustrating state
of affairs. JATO Business Director Nasir Shah believes the industry
has made incredible advances in reducing CO2 emissions. We're also
seeing marked increases in recyclable content and more energy efficient
manufacture. All of this environmental progress costs money. If
ill-judged taxation starves the industry, the process of improving
environmental performance can't be maintained.
The motor industry will continue to clean up its environmental act.
Given properly considered environmental taxes we'll see ongoing
improvements in fuel economy and reduced emissions. But strangling
sales, pricing fuel to impractical levels and destroying second-hand
value are short-sighted tactics that will take us all in exactly
the opposite direction.
| |
Get
covered for less

|
|
|